Craps dc7 system
Jul 21, · Home Page: Craps Message Board: DC You are currently not logged in. You can view the forums, is the same as the DC-7 craps system sold for $ on. Aug 21, · Las Vegas discussion forum - "DC7" Question, page 1. Jan 24, · What I'm about to give you is a proven craps system I developed in less than 5 hours I shit you not here it is: I developed this system in and it.
It would be an economic boom for the state that took that leap. August 21st, at 9: No one has ever reported losing a buy-in. It has to be because the 7 is the most easily made number. On the progression, DC-7 delivered an average profit of 8. How much do you need to bring to a table? The author claims 8 units per hour using the 3-step martingale and 5 units per hour using flat bets.
Resource Limit Is Reached
You can view the forums, but cannot post messages. The question with the DC-7 system is 'what game' is it playing? What does it need from the dice results to deliver the goods. And when the dice don't deliver, how does it dig itself out of the hole, and overcome the even chance nature of the game, plus the inherent house percentage to show a profit. How many times in a row can the system lose? THAT is what we need to know. After point number is established then lay single odds against the point and make a don't come bet of one unit.
When the DC bet goes to a box number, remove the odds on the don't pass bet and wait for a decision. The author recomends a martingale MM. On top of which the 'inventor' is really playing the DON'T side of the table where you have the LOWEST house percentage against you in the whole casino, and reduces that advantage by making a Pass bet which loses when the shooter 7's out.
The only 'good' bet that the system makes is leaving the single Don't Come bet out after the Point is made. Taking down the odds of the DP bet is silly because they are 'free odds' and the best bet after the Don't Come bet on a number.
Lay double or triple odds and 'effectively' you are no longer playing 'casino craps' but playing against the frequency the 7 shows and the flow of money dictated by the true odds of each number. For this you need more than a 30 unit bank roll of you make continual DP bets, or even put a 'stop loss' on each shooter of say the first 5 rolls after the 7 shows. You might 'survive' the DC-7 Martingale progression busting out for years, then get whacked a few times and all your profits are gone.
I smiled shyly and offered her the cake. I'm sorry!", she said. Видимо я вздрогнул, потому что она спросила: - Что ты такой напряженный. "Stay afterwards, can you Jake. Лежать в одной позе развратнице не нравилось, поэтому она принимала разнообразные позиции, пытаясь найти самую удобную.
I'm sorry I caused confusion when I said 2x Odds, as I could see why that would lead to confusion. I'm laying whatever odds I need to win 2 units if a 7 is rolled immediately. For the 4, 5, 9, and 10 it would be odds to win 2 units. So if 6 is the base unit, and a 9 was rolled, then I would lay 18, to win 12 2x base bet. As shown in my calculations above, this results in losing 3 units for the 5 or 9 on a back to back point number, 4 units lost on 4 or 10, and 2.
I apologize for the mixed wording, but it shouldn't change my math at all. Whether or not this case is covered in descriptions of the strategy varies. I left it out of my original description by accident. Like the previous flaw, it doesn't break the system, but it does reduce the expected outcome, which remains positive until the next flaw is accounted for.
I am looking at the statement: So again, I'm not sure what I'm missing I do believe every system is flawed and not a positive expectation but I am not satisfied with the link provided as reasonable doubt.
Jul 22, Threads: August 21st, at 1: I looked 5 pages back and didn't see anything about this, so I hope I'm not repeating a question but here goes I'm mostly an advantage player in a casino, but one of my fun games I love to drink and relax at is craps.
Even so, the AP in me can't help but try to play "better odds" bets. That being said I don't always play the 'best' odds bets, but I am primarily a Don't Pass player and shooter - my lord I'm really good at crapping out and Don't Come with odds player. Anyways I came across this youtube video for a don't side strategy he called DC7: One of 4 things can happen: Go back to 1 - Shooter throws 2, 3, or Stay at 2 - Shooter throws any other point number.
You would have to have read his book. Jun 8, Threads: June 8th, at I was wondering if the wizard ever checked Yuri's dice sets in his book. I was wondering how accurate his calculations are. I know Stanford Wong quoted him some in his book. I see no one else uses or recommends any of Yuri's dice sets so I was wondering if his calculations were wrong or misguided.
It appears he put a good deal of time into his determinations and in theory they make sense but in the casino math always beats theory. Nov 17, Threads: I am not familiar with "Yuri's dice sets" Can you provide some highlights? Voice of the Announcer: Meanwhile, at an abandoned gold mine, a sinister figure lurks. I love to lurk. Oct 14, Threads: June 8th, at 5: They are different than anything the modern day gurus are teaching. He seems to feel as we all know the seven is coming so make as much money as you can before it happens on certain numbers rather than "I am going to have a really long roll".
I do not believe he feels most people even himself had or have the control to consistently have primary hits such as the hardways when you are setting for them. Instead he believes you will more times than not have a quarter or a double pitch. His theory is based on you being able to keep the dice on axis as all modern day teachers teach and having those dice only come up with the possible combinations if the dice stay on axis.
This particular dice set shown in the book had the on top which put a on the bottom and a facing you. The book was probably one of the first on the subject and is a short interesting read I enjoyed it and was just wondering if his calculations made any sense as I am not a math guy. Mar 8, Threads: June 8th, at 7: This will only work if you have have garlic spray behind each ear.
And you are a Gemini. June 8th, at 8: Nathan's Corner proven Roulette strategy What did you eat today?